This House Supports the UDS

Thoughts on the UDS’s most controversial debate yet.

The UDS has released the follow statement on the debate:

Public debate motions do not advocate action. All speeches made on the night will be satirical. The Union Debating Society unambiguously condemns political assassination or violence of any kind. Mocking Donald Trump’s blatantly offensive ideas is the only way we could find anyone to defend Trump in St Andrews and have a debate on the US election. Our intention was never to offend, the motion title is styled as a hyperbolic stance to generate debate. We expect the debate to centre whether it is legitimate to sacrifice our moral compasses and the sanctity of democracy in order to protect the world from a racist, xenophobic bigot. So far we’ve had no direct complaints from students or the public, and would encourage those concerned to email [email protected].


Unless you’ve been living under a rock recently (it’s deadline season, I won’t judge you), you’ll probably have heard of the recent stramash surrounding the St Andrews Union Debating Society. Put simply, the UDS is this week hosting a motion entitled “This House Would Assassinate President Trump.” And some people are very upset about it.

A national newspaper has run an article talking about the debate in reference to the assassination of Jo Cox MP. Local politicians have emerged to shake their heads and wring their hands over the motion. Even the University itself has condemned the motion as “in poor taste.” All very dramatic. But it shouldn’t be. Hopefully, this article will explain this latest storm in a St Andrean teacup, and why, precisely, it’s not worth getting worked up over. 

First of all, to understand this situation, you must understand the UDS. And to understand the UDS, you must understand its inherent ridiculousness. This is a society that starts every public debate with poorly impersonations, a sword named Bessie, and an elaborate opening ceremony involving calls for the President to resign. Its trademark is humorous theatricality and convoluted drama – not precisely the kind of stuff that keeps MI5 awake at night.

Look at it this way: If you saw a Simpsonepisode that featured a joke about killing Trump, you’d treat it slightly differently to Andrew Neil doing a monologue on the same subject on Daily Politics. Context is important. 

Photo: UDS
Photo: UDS

Another UDS myth floating around is that it’s some kind of hotbed of radical leftism. Incorrect. The UDS board of ten is politically diverse. It includes Tories, Socialists and the one person in Britain who still likes Nick Clegg. The crowd that the public debates cater to are no revolutionaries either. While the fact that public debates are open to everyone means there are often wildly divergent views on display (not that this is a bad thing), a look at the results of debates that have taken place so far this year shows that UDS audiences usually vote against radical motions, be they left wing or right. 

So, now that we’ve established that this debate is neither a threat to the wellbeing of any tiny-handed populists, nor likely to lead to the formation of revolutionary cadres on South Street, let’s look at the actual salient issue here: free speech. This motion is a joke. The UDS is not inciting anyone to violence. There is no conceivable way that anyone could be hurt as a result of it. Yet they’ve faced pressure, not just from other students but from politicians and the national press, to cancel it.

Why? Because people were offended. Think about that for a second. We’re being told that the rights of our fellow student end where the feelings of others begin, that expressing an opinion is tantamount to violence. Is that not a little worrying? 

Now, to clarify, I’m not saying you should support this motion. But you shouldn’t ban it either. It offends you? Then go down to Lower Parliament Hall on Thursday and speak against it. You don’t win arguments by refusing to have them. Trump supporters can claim that those defending having this debate might be just as offended by it if the motion was “This House Would Assassinate President Clinton.” They may even be right. But you know what? The offence taken by Clinton supporters wouldn’t be a good enough reason to not have that debate, either. Free speech is not an issue of left and right. It’s an issue of right and wrong. 

And also, for God’s sake Trump supporters – if you can’t be counted on to not get offended by a joke in poor taste, then who the hell can?

Comments

comments

36 thoughts on “This House Supports the UDS

  1. Hiya, I am really glad I’ve found this information. Today bloggers publish only about gossips and web and this is really annoying. A good blog with exciting content, this is what I need. Thank you for keeping this site, I’ll be visiting it. Do you do newsletters? Can’t find it.

  2. Greetings, I do think your website may be having browser compatibility problems. When I take a look at your website in Safari, it looks fine however, if opening in Internet Explorer, it’s got some overlapping issues. I simply wanted to give you a quick heads up! Besides that, fantastic blog.

  3. This is really interesting, You’re an overly professional blogger. I have joined your rss feed and look ahead to in the hunt for more of your fantastic post. Also, I’ve shared your site in my social networks!

  4. This is the right web site for everyone who wants to find out about this topic. You know so much its almost tough to argue with you (not that I really would want to…HaHa). You certainly put a new spin on a topic that’s been discussed for a long time. Excellent stuff, just great!

  5. Many thanks for your post. I’d really like to say that the price of car insurance differs a lot from one plan to another, given that there are so many different facets which contribute to the overall cost. By way of example, the brand name of the motor vehicle will have a tremendous bearing on the price. A reliable aged family automobile will have a more affordable premium compared to a flashy performance car.

  6. PBN sites
    We’ll build a system of private blog network sites!

    Merits of our private blog network:

    We execute everything SO THAT google doesn’t understand that this A privately-owned blog network!!!

    1- We obtain domain names from different registrars

    2- The principal site is hosted on a VPS server (Virtual Private Server is fast hosting)

    3- Additional sites are on separate hostings

    4- We allocate a unique Google account to each site with verification in Google Search Console.

    5- We design websites on WordPress, we don’t utilise plugins with assisted by which Trojans penetrate and through which pages on your websites are established.

    6- We refrain from reiterate templates and employ only unique text and pictures

    We refrain from work with website design; the client, if wished, can then edit the websites to suit his wishes

  7. Normally I do not learn article on blogs, however I wish to say that this write-up very forced me to check out and do it! Your writing style has been surprised me. Thanks, quite nice article.

  8. One thing I would really like to say is the fact that before obtaining more computer system memory, look at the machine directly into which it could be installed. In case the machine can be running Windows XP, for instance, the particular memory limit is 3.25GB. Putting in above this would simply constitute some sort of waste. Be sure that one’s motherboard can handle the upgrade amount, as well. Interesting blog post.

  9. This is the perfect site for everyone who wants to understand this topic. You understand a whole lot its almost hard to argue with you (not that I actually will need to…HaHa). You definitely put a new spin on a topic which has been written about for years. Wonderful stuff, just great.

  10. Hey there would you mind letting me know which webhost you’re working with? I’ve loaded your blog in 3 completely different internet browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot faster then most. Can you recommend a good internet hosting provider at a reasonable price? Many thanks, I appreciate it!

  11. Good day! I could have sworn I’ve been to this blog before but after going through a few of the posts I realized it’s new to me. Regardless, I’m certainly delighted I stumbled upon it and I’ll be book-marking it and checking back frequently.

  12. I figured out more something totally new on this fat loss issue. 1 issue is a good nutrition is tremendously vital while dieting. A big reduction in bad foods, sugary ingredients, fried foods, sugary foods, beef, and white-colored flour products may be necessary. Possessing wastes parasites, and toxins may prevent targets for losing fat. While selected drugs briefly solve the condition, the nasty side effects are usually not worth it, and they never offer more than a short-term solution. It is just a known incontrovertible fact that 95 of fad diets fail. Many thanks sharing your thinking on this blog site.

  13. Aw, this was a really nice post. Taking the time and actual effort to generate a very good article… but what can I say… I hesitate a whole lot and don’t manage to get nearly anything done.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

THE STAND