Romeo & Juliet: A Star-Crossed Flop

By Editor 7 years ago

The Stage’s latest play failed to impress.

Rating: ☆☆☆/5

The programme boldly states: “This isn’t your traditional show. We’ve built a world.” Intriguing, but also a big promise. Queueing outside, I expected to be led into a highly detailed, engaging space, but unfortunately the audience was met by Juliet on an empty set. Had the whole set been developed to the same extent as Friar Laurence’s cell, I could have gotten on board with the idea of a “world.”

This was a student production done on a student budget, and there is nothing wrong with that. However, if the production team, very fairly, can’t afford to create a set with any level of detail, then they shouldn’t pretend that they have. The setting up of the street was interesting, and effective, but again not really world creation. The idea of the”‘world” was the very centre of director Oli Savage’s vision, meaning that the whole show was marred by a lack of understanding of limitations, which had some unfortunate knock-on effects.

This was also billed as a “devised” performance, which translated to one very enjoyable dance scene, with drunk Mercutio causing mayhem, but also to several poorly executed fight-dances punctuated by questionable music. Actors ended up doing haphazard hops and awkward swings, bumping into each other frequently. I wish that the production team had focused on this element at rehearsal, as the choreography was good, but the actors weren’t confident enough to implement it. Particularly suspect was the bed scene, which was not helped by saccharine and clichéd music.

The “promenade” aspect of the show didn’t take into account the nature of the space, so again while the idea was there, limitations were not understood. It was, however, different from normal St. Andrews drama, and an enjoyable play on the tradition of standing to watch Shakespeare at the Globe. Even when directly next to actors in conversation, a scene from the other side of the room would render parts unintelligible. At one point, a mobile phone rang over the speakers, entirely ruining Juliet’s scene. It was meant to indicate communication between the Friar and Romeo, but as all the audience members were looking the other way, this was lost and seemed like an error. The recurring motif of the show was that a scene in one half of the space would begin as another in the other half of the space would end. This was entirely unnecessary, and seems to have been done for its own sake. The two elements that could have made this show ultimately held it back.

There were several excellent elements: Seb Bridges and Kezia Johnson as Lord and Lady Capulet were impressive, conveying the authority of the characters convincingly. Ellie Burke as Tybalt was so confident with her character that the “gender-bending” became secondary, and didn’t seem at odds with the text. 

Unfortunately, that was far as that concept went. I got the impression that Caitlin Morris as Romeo didn’t get to grips with her character, as demonstrated in the seminal balcony scene, where her love for Juliet wasn’t expressed entirely convincingly. I think the issue lies in that, whatever the production team may think, Romeo is an overwhelmingly male character. Moreover, the script didn’t seem to have been fully edited to accommodate all the gender-swapping, leading to some confusing moments. More importantly, there were times when Romeo as a woman made no textual sense (see Friar Laurence’s “art thou a man?” speech), and this encapsulates the issues with the show. Mercutio and Benvolio’s homosexual relationship existed only to have two men kiss on stage (hardly controversial in 2017), and added nothing to their overall dynamic.

Oli Savage has to question some of his creative decisions, as they ultimately added little to the text. I think the problem lies in that he had too many ideas, and wanted to execute them all, rather than a few of them very well.

Overall, this was a production with some bold ideas set out in a strong social media campaign, with some lovely graphic design. Yet the threads were never drawn together, and an overreaching, and consequently poorly executed, creative vision meant that the show overpromised but under delivered. However, some strong performances and a refreshing change to traditional staging led to an enjoyable performance.

Comments

comments

Tags: , ,

131 thoughts on “Romeo & Juliet: A Star-Crossed Flop”

  7. PBN sites
    We establish a web of PBN sites!

    Merits of our self-owned blog network:

    WE DO everything SO THAT Google DOES NOT grasp THAT this is A private blog network!!!

    1- We obtain domain names from different registrars

    2- The primary site is hosted on a VPS hosting (Virtual Private Server is rapid hosting)

    3- The remaining sites are on separate hostings

    4- We allocate a distinct Google account to each site with confirmation in Search Console.

    5- We design websites on WordPress, we do not utilise plugins with assistance from which malware penetrate and through which pages on your websites are generated.

    6- We don’t duplicate templates and utilise only exclusive text and pictures

    We refrain from work with website design; the client, if wanted, can then edit the websites to suit his wishes

    Reply

  14. Hi, It has come to our attention that you are using our client’s photographs on your site without a valid licence. We have already posted out all supporting documents to the address of your office. Please confirm once you have received them. In the meantime, we would like to invite you to settle this dispute by making the below payment of £500. Visual Rights Group Ltd, KBC Bank London, IBAN: GB39 KRED 1654 8703, 1135 11, Account Number: 03113511, Sort Code: 16-54-87 Once you have made the payment, please email us with your payment reference number. Please note that a failure to settle at this stage will only accrue greater costs once the matter is referred to court. I thank you for your cooperation and look forward to your reply. Yours sincerely, Visual Rights Group Ltd, Company No. 11747843, Polhill Business Centre, London Road, Polhill, TN14 7AA, Registered Address: 42-44 Clarendon Road, Watford WD17 1JJ

    Reply

  15. Hi, It has come to our attention that you are using our client’s photographs on your site without a valid licence. We have already posted out all supporting documents to the address of your office. Please confirm once you have received them. In the meantime, we would like to invite you to settle this dispute by making the below payment of £500. Visual Rights Group Ltd, KBC Bank London, IBAN: GB39 KRED 1654 8703, 1135 11, Account Number: 03113511, Sort Code: 16-54-87 Once you have made the payment, please email us with your payment reference number. Please note that a failure to settle at this stage will only accrue greater costs once the matter is referred to court. I thank you for your cooperation and look forward to your reply. Yours sincerely, Visual Rights Group Ltd, Company No. 11747843, Polhill Business Centre, London Road, Polhill, TN14 7AA, Registered Address: 42-44 Clarendon Road, Watford WD17 1JJ

    Reply

  16. Hi, It has come to our attention that you are using our client’s photographs on your site without a valid licence. We have already posted out all supporting documents to the address of your office. Please confirm once you have received them. In the meantime, we would like to invite you to settle this dispute by making the below payment of £500. Visual Rights Group Ltd, KBC Bank London, IBAN: GB39 KRED 1654 8703, 1135 11, Account Number: 03113511, Sort Code: 16-54-87 Once you have made the payment, please email us with your payment reference number. Please note that a failure to settle at this stage will only accrue greater costs once the matter is referred to court. I thank you for your cooperation and look forward to your reply. Yours sincerely, Visual Rights Group Ltd, Company No. 11747843, Polhill Business Centre, London Road, Polhill, TN14 7AA, Registered Address: 42-44 Clarendon Road, Watford WD17 1JJ

    Reply

  17. Hi, It has come to our attention that you are using our client’s photographs on your site without a valid licence. We have already posted out all supporting documents to the address of your office. Please confirm once you have received them. In the meantime, we would like to invite you to settle this dispute by making the below payment of £500. Visual Rights Group Ltd, KBC Bank London, IBAN: GB39 KRED 1654 8703, 1135 11, Account Number: 03113511, Sort Code: 16-54-87 Once you have made the payment, please email us with your payment reference number. Please note that a failure to settle at this stage will only accrue greater costs once the matter is referred to court. I thank you for your cooperation and look forward to your reply. Yours sincerely, Visual Rights Group Ltd, Company No. 11747843, Polhill Business Centre, London Road, Polhill, TN14 7AA, Registered Address: 42-44 Clarendon Road, Watford WD17 1JJ

    Reply

  18. Hi, It has come to our attention that you are using our client’s photographs on your site without a valid licence. We have already posted out all supporting documents to the address of your office. Please confirm once you have received them. In the meantime, we would like to invite you to settle this dispute by making the below payment of £500. Visual Rights Group Ltd, KBC Bank London, IBAN: GB39 KRED 1654 8703, 1135 11, Account Number: 03113511, Sort Code: 16-54-87 Once you have made the payment, please email us with your payment reference number. Please note that a failure to settle at this stage will only accrue greater costs once the matter is referred to court. I thank you for your cooperation and look forward to your reply. Yours sincerely, Visual Rights Group Ltd, Company No. 11747843, Polhill Business Centre, London Road, Polhill, TN14 7AA, Registered Address: 42-44 Clarendon Road, Watford WD17 1JJ

    Reply

  19. Hi, It has come to our attention that you are using our client’s photographs on your site without a valid licence. We have already posted out all supporting documents to the address of your office. Please confirm once you have received them. In the meantime, we would like to invite you to settle this dispute by making the below payment of £500. Visual Rights Group Ltd, KBC Bank London, IBAN: GB39 KRED 1654 8703, 1135 11, Account Number: 03113511, Sort Code: 16-54-87 Once you have made the payment, please email us with your payment reference number. Please note that a failure to settle at this stage will only accrue greater costs once the matter is referred to court. I thank you for your cooperation and look forward to your reply. Yours sincerely, Visual Rights Group Ltd, Company No. 11747843, Polhill Business Centre, London Road, Polhill, TN14 7AA, Registered Address: 42-44 Clarendon Road, Watford WD17 1JJ

    Reply

  48. הימורים מקוונים הם חווייה מרגשות ופופולרית ביותר בעידן הדיגיטלי, שמביאה מיליונים אנשים מכל
    כל רחבי העולם. ההימורים המקוונים מתבצעים על אירועים ספורט, תוצאות פוליטיות ואפילו תוצאות מזג האוויר ונושאים נוספים. אתרים ל הימורים הווירטואליים מקריאים פוטנציאליים את כל מי שרוצה להמר על תוצאות אפשרות ולהנות רגעים של חוויה והתרגשות.

    ההימורים המקוונים הם מהם כבר חלק מהותי מתרבות החברה מזמן רב והיום הם לא רק חלק מרכזי מהפעילות הכלכלית והתרבותית, אלא כמו כן מספקים הכנסות וחוויות מרתקות. משום שהם נגישים מאוד ונוחים לשימוש, הם מאפשרים לכולם מהניסיון ולהצליח לנצח בכל זמן ובכל מקום.

    טכנולוגיות דיגיטליות והימורים מקוונים הפכו להיות הפופולריים ביותר מעניינת ופופולרית. מיליוני אנשים מכל רחבי העולם מעוניינים בהימורים, כוללים סוגים שונים של הימורים. הימורים מקוונים מציעים למשתתפים חוויה מהנה ומרגשת, המתאימה לכולם בכל זמן ובכל מקום.

    אז מה חכם אתה מחכה למה? הצטרף עכשיו והתחיל לחוות את ההתרגשות וההנאה שהימורים מקוונים מציעים.

    Reply

  96. 프라그마틱은 다양한 언어와 화폐를 지원하는데, 이로 인해 글로벌 유저들에게 높은 평가를 받고 있어요.
    프라그마틱 슬롯 무료 체험

    프라그마틱 슬롯에 대한 내용이 정말 도움이 되었어요! 더불어, 제 사이트에서도 프라그마틱과 관련된 정보를 찾아보실 수 있어요. 함께 지식을 공유해보세요!

    https://www.12315ox.cn/
    https://0cdnara.com/hot/
    https://www.antiquees.com

    Reply

  127. Player台灣線上娛樂城遊戲指南與評測

    台灣最佳線上娛樂城遊戲的終極指南！我們提供專業評測，分析熱門老虎機、百家樂、棋牌及其他賭博遊戲。從遊戲規則、策略到選擇最佳娛樂城，我們全方位覆蓋，協助您更安全的遊玩。

    layer如何評測：公正與專業的評分標準

    在【Player娛樂城遊戲評測網】我們致力於為玩家提供最公正、最專業的娛樂城評測。我們的評測過程涵蓋多個關鍵領域，旨在確保玩家獲得可靠且全面的信息。以下是我們評測娛樂城的主要步驟：

    安全與公平性
    安全永遠是我們評測的首要標準。我們審查每家娛樂城的執照資訊、監管機構以及使用的隨機數生成器，以確保其遊戲結果的公平性和隨機性。
    02.
    遊戲品質與多樣性
    遊戲的品質和多樣性對於玩家體驗至關重要。我們評估遊戲的圖形、音效、用戶介面和創新性。同時，我們也考量娛樂城提供的遊戲種類，包括老虎機、桌遊、即時遊戲等。

    03.
    娛樂城優惠與促銷活動
    我們仔細審視各種獎勵計劃和促銷活動，包括歡迎獎勵、免費旋轉和忠誠計劃。重要的是，我們也檢查這些優惠的賭注要求和條款條件，以確保它們公平且實用。
    04.
    客戶支持
    優質的客戶支持是娛樂城質量的重要指標。我們評估支持團隊的可用性、響應速度和專業程度。一個好的娛樂城應該提供多種聯繫方式，包括即時聊天、電子郵件和電話支持。
    05.
    銀行與支付選項
    我們檢查娛樂城提供的存款和提款選項，以及相關的處理時間和手續費。多樣化且安全的支付方式對於玩家來說非常重要。
    06.
    網站易用性、娛樂城APP體驗
    一個直觀且易於導航的網站可以顯著提升玩家體驗。我們評估網站的設計、可訪問性和移動兼容性。
    07.
    玩家評價與反饋
    我們考慮真實玩家的評價和反饋。這些資料幫助我們了解娛樂城在實際玩家中的表現。

    娛樂城常見問題

    娛樂城是什麼？

    娛樂城是什麼?娛樂城是台灣對於線上賭場的特別稱呼，線上賭場分為幾種：現金版、信用版、手機娛樂城(娛樂城APP)，一般來說，台灣人在稱娛樂城時，是指現金版線上賭場。

    線上賭場在別的國家也有別的名稱，美國 – Casino, Gambling、中國 – 线上赌场,娱乐城、日本 – オンラインカジノ、越南 – Nhà cái。

    娛樂城會被抓嗎？

    在台灣，根據刑法第266條，不論是實體或線上賭博，參與賭博的行為可處最高5萬元罰金。而根據刑法第268條，為賭博提供場所並意圖營利的行為，可能面臨3年以下有期徒刑及最高9萬元罰金。一般賭客若被抓到，通常被視為輕微罪行，原則上不會被判處監禁。

    信用版娛樂城是什麼？

    信用版娛樂城是一種線上賭博平台，其中的賭博活動不是直接以現金進行交易，而是基於信用系統。在這種模式下，玩家在進行賭博時使用虛擬的信用點數或籌碼，這些點數或籌碼代表了一定的貨幣價值，但實際的金錢交易會在賭博活動結束後進行結算。

    現金版娛樂城是什麼？

    現金版娛樂城是一種線上博弈平台，其中玩家使用實際的金錢進行賭博活動。玩家需要先存入真實貨幣，這些資金轉化為平台上的遊戲籌碼或信用，用於參與各種賭場遊戲。當玩家贏得賭局時，他們可以將這些籌碼或信用兌換回現金。

    娛樂城體驗金是什麼？

    娛樂城體驗金是娛樂場所為新客戶提供的一種免費遊玩資金，允許玩家在不需要自己投入任何資金的情況下，可以進行各類遊戲的娛樂城試玩。這種體驗金的數額一般介於100元到1,000元之間，且對於如何使用這些體驗金以達到提款條件，各家娛樂城設有不同的規則。

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

THE STAND