The Place of External Investment Within Sport

Read Arthur’s take on wealthy owners using money coming from outside the world of sport to fund their clubs.

Anyone who has survived this week without getting trapped in a cupboard with no news from the outside world will have heard about Manchester City’s two-year-ban from the UEFA Champions League. Rather than go into the minute details of why the clubs has been banned, I think it is far more interesting to use this incident as a springboard to a broader discussion on the place of external investment within in sports.

Photo [Pexels]
In the early 2000s Roman Abramovich utterly transformed Chelsea with his takeover as did Sheikh Mansour when he took over Manchester City in 2008. Nowadays it seems as soon as there is even a whiff of a potential sale of a football club, more foreign billionaires are linked with potential takeovers much like Mohammed bin Salman has been with Manchester United. Thus, the concept of external (and often foreign) money being invested in British sports is here to stay. This idea of bringing external wealth into sports is by no means a novel concept. In 416BC, the wealthy Athenian general Alcibiades entered seven chariots into one race, while Philip II of Macedon likewise sponsored a chariot and saw it win at the Ancient Olympic Games. The reason these public figures invested their personal fortunes in sporting endeavours still resonates today: a desire to enhance their image, show off their wealth and to just have fun. Thus, one would be hard-pressed to argue that this idea of spending one’s own money within sports is by any means a new one, and consequently, should it be criticised?

Photo [Wikimedia Commons]
Indeed, in many fields, spending one’s personal fortune acquired through other means is not only not looked down upon but in fact lauded. One of Donald Trump’s favourite catchphrases on his way to the presidency was that he was “entirely self-funded” and was not influenced by “donors and special interests.” Rather than being seen as a billionaire using his personal wealth to meddle in politics, this was praised as meaning he wasn’t beholden to other groups. Some might argue that, by owners funding football clubs out of their own pockets, it diminishes the say sponsors and other external groups may have over the club’s activities which might be a good thing. There were certainly rumblings about the potential influence of Adidas (Manchester United’s shirt sponsor) in the club’s acquisition of Paul Pogba and questions can undoubtedly be raised as to whether, due to the club’s financial dependence on their sponsor, a footballing decision (whether to buy Pogba) was influenced by financial pressure; a billionaire foreign owner able to self-fund his club’s actions in the transfer market would certainly diminish this potential for leverage.

Photo [Wikimedia Commons]
Financial Fair Play was introduced, ostensibly, to stop clubs from spending radically outside their means by the way or their owners’ personal bank accounts. However, as mentioned above, the idea of using one’s personal fortune to fund sporting activities goes back a long time and the same angst against this influx of external money is not replicated in any other competitive area of life such as politics or any forms of business. Thus, before we all cheer the demise of Manchester City’s European ambitions, perhaps we should first consider whether the rules they are alleged to have broken are actually appropriate to begin with and whether we ned to recognise that, just as many other elements of football have evolved, wealthy owners driving clubs into Europe’s elite should be seen as fair and part of the sport. After all, would it be fair for Manchester City to have always been second to Manchester United purely because they couldn’t compete financially with them or is the fairest process to simply allow clubs to earn and spend money in whatever way they like?

Photo [Flickr]

Comments

comments

17 thoughts on “The Place of External Investment Within Sport

  1. 최신 프라그마틱 게임은 선도적이고 표준화된 iGaming 콘텐츠를 제공하며 슬롯, 라이브 카지노, 빙고 등 다양한 제품을 제공합니다.
    프라그마틱슬롯

    프라그마틱에 대한 글 읽는 것이 정말 즐거웠어요! 또한, 제 사이트에서도 프라그마틱과 관련된 정보를 공유하고 있어요. 함께 발전하며 더 많은 지식을 쌓아가요!

    https://doggggqwe.weebly.com/
    https://atlgrup.com/link/
    https://www.12315lt.cn/

  2. PBN sites
    We will establish a system of self-owned blog network sites!

    Pros of our privately-owned blog network:

    WE DO everything so Google does not comprehend THAT this is A private blog network!!!

    1- We buy domain names from various registrars

    2- The leading site is hosted on a VPS hosting (Virtual Private Server is high-speed hosting)

    3- Other sites are on various hostings

    4- We assign a individual Google ID to each site with confirmation in Google Search Console.

    5- We design websites on WordPress, we do not utilize plugins with assistance from which malware penetrate and through which pages on your websites are established.

    6- We never reproduce templates and utilise only unique text and pictures

    We don’t work with website design; the client, if wished, can then edit the websites to suit his wishes

  3. https://www.alldatingwebsites.com/reviews/flirt.com/
    https://www.datingsitesreviews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?showtopic=8185
    https://beyondages.com/flirt-review/
    https://www.alldatingwebsites.com/reviews/flirt.com/682-flirtcom–do-not-use.php
    https://www.reddit.com/r/Scams/comments/meiute/flirtcom_is_a_scam/
    https://justhookup.com/sites/flirt-review/
    https://www.datingwise.com/review/flirt.com/
    https://healthyframework.com/flirt-com-review/

    Flirt.com is a scam
    Hi all, got scammed by this website. Saw that there were a couple of post informing about this but just wanted to give more details
    Paid for the three day offer and with the confirmation of the subscription, got two mails from hornycontacts.com and loveaholics.com asking me to confirm my email. Didn’t pay attention and deleted them.
    I immediately canceled the subscription in flirt.com without any issue and on the last day it changed to a standard membership so since it was bs site, cancelled the account as well.
    So I was happy and watching a movie when I got an sms from my card provider telling me that I got a 71.78 euros charge from fry frtlsp.com. Never heard of them, so I called my card provider and cancelled my card and will request the return of the money as well.
    Then I realized that maybe these two websites also by some miracle signed me up to a paid subscription… so I logged in… had to recover the passwords because they were not the one I used in flirt.com… and surprise, loveaholics.com did signed me up for a paid subscription without me being aware (pretty sure that somewhere during the signing process in flirt there was something checked and didn’t pay attention.). So I had to cancel subscription and account in these two other sites.
    So, sorry for the long post but in summary…. do not use flirt.com at all!!!
    Yes, FLIRT.COM it is a scamming website. It sign you on multiple websites like askme4date.com . It bombard you with emails that you receive messages, and you need to pay to see them. After you pay you see the messages. All messages are from BOTS. No real person.
    It’s subscribing to automatic renewal and it’s hard to cancel renewal. They push you to a complicated scheme. I’m not even sure the renewal canceling works. After

  4. Pingback: joker gaming
  5. Pingback: muscat jobs

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

THE STAND